https://sputnikglobe.com/20260317/too-risky-to-follow-why-nato-allies-wont-join-the-us-hormuz-crusade-1123840227.html
Too Risky to Follow? Why NATO Allies Won’t Join US Hormuz Crusade
Too Risky to Follow? Why NATO Allies Won’t Join US Hormuz Crusade
Sputnik International
NATO members are hesitant to participate in the US-led maritime operation in the Strait of Hormuz “due to the uncertainty on the battlefield,” Turkish political analyst Hasan Selim Ozertem tells Sputnik.
2026-03-17T14:50+0000
2026-03-17T14:50+0000
2026-03-17T19:13+0000
us
iran
analysis
nato
strait of hormuz
defense
route
destroyer
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07ea/03/11/1123840625_0:0:3246:1827_1920x0_80_0_0_49eda6627fa995966e1b85ad3c8b9564.jpg
These countries “cannot be certain of the safety of their navy forces,” Ozertem explains, noting that recent events have demonstrated that US vessels are vulnerable to Iranian missiles and “cannot be protected against sea mines in the Persian Gulf. In that regard, I think nobody wants to become part of this ongoing conflict,” he says.Fears of Losing Face and Strategic Miscalculations Another challenge is the fact that the Strait of Hormuz is “a narrow sea route and none of the US destroyers are safe when they accompany any vessels out of the Persian Gulf,” and in this vein, a possible loss of a destroyer could be a loss of face for the US administration, Ozertem points out.The analyst notes that the US administration has pursued two strategies for Iran: orchestrating a Venezuela-style transition of power or fomenting a popular uprising. With neither materializing, Washington has clearly misjudged Tehran's ability to endure a long, drawn-out conflict, particularly through its use of UAVs and missiles.US Operation Epic Fury Lacks Clear Goal One of the goals could be a power change in Iran even though “the Iranian state proved to be resilient and the current system continues to survive,” which is why such a US goal is now “not on the table,” he points out.The most relevant version could pertain to the fact that the US “followed Israel in this operation,” which is reflected in Trump’s or Rubio's statements about Iran allegedly targeting America if it refused to support Israel’s strikes on the Islamic Republic, Ozertem concludes.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20260317/us-struggles-to-build-hormuz-coalition-as-allies-hold-back-1123836800.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20260316/uk-resists-sending-warships-to-hormuz-mission-sought-by-trump--reports-1123830507.html
iran
strait of hormuz
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2026
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
us-led maritime operation in the strait of hormuz, nato's future, narrow sea route, power change in iran,
us-led maritime operation in the strait of hormuz, nato's future, narrow sea route, power change in iran,
Too Risky to Follow? Why NATO Allies Won’t Join US Hormuz Crusade
14:50 GMT 17.03.2026 (Updated: 19:13 GMT 17.03.2026) Germany, Spain, Italy, and France—along with non-NATO members Japan and South Korea—are hesitant to participate in the US-led maritime operation in the Strait of Hormuz “due to the uncertainty on the battlefield,” says Hasan Selim Ozertem, a Turkish-based political analyst interviewed by Sputnik.
These countries “cannot be certain of the safety of their navy forces,” Ozertem explains, noting that
recent events have demonstrated that US vessels are vulnerable to Iranian missiles and “cannot be protected against sea mines in the Persian Gulf. In that regard, I think nobody wants to become part of this ongoing conflict,” he says.
Fears of Losing Face and Strategic Miscalculations
Although Trump made it clear that NATO's future will be questioned if US allies don’t support Washington’s Hormuz operation, the problem is that “NATO is a defense alliance rather than one which would join an offensive operation without a United Nations Security Council decision or the go-ahead by NATO members,” the pundit notes.
Another challenge is the fact that the Strait of Hormuz is “a narrow sea route and none of the US destroyers are safe when they accompany any vessels out of
the Persian Gulf,” and in this vein, a possible loss of a destroyer could be a loss of face for the US administration, Ozertem points out.
Last but not least, “Washington thought the war could end in a short period of time rather than turn into a kind of a protracted conflict,” he underscores.
The analyst notes that the US administration has pursued two strategies for Iran: orchestrating a Venezuela-style transition of power or fomenting a popular uprising. With neither materializing, Washington has clearly misjudged Tehran's ability to endure a long, drawn-out conflict, particularly through its use of UAVs and missiles.
US Operation Epic Fury Lacks Clear Goal
The international community is in the dark about the “strategic objective” of Washington’s Operation Epic Fury against Iran as the “new goals are daily articulated by the top US officials,” Ozertem says.
One of the goals could be a power change in Iran even though “the Iranian state proved to be resilient and the current system continues to survive,” which is why such a US goal is now “not on the table,” he points out.
One more possible goal could be related to reports that the Gulf states felt unsafe and urged the US to remain in the region and “eliminate leverages in the control of Iran,” the analyst suggests.
The most relevant version could pertain to the fact that the US “followed Israel in this operation,” which is reflected in Trump’s or Rubio's statements about Iran allegedly targeting America if it refused to support Israel’s strikes on the Islamic Republic, Ozertem concludes.
